Season 2, Episodes 1 and 2, “Slow Tango In South Seattle” and “The Unkindest Cut Of All”
Original air dates: Sept. 20, 1994, and Sept. 27, 1994
Sidant: And so begins the second season of Frasier with the episode titled “Slow Tango in South Seattle.”
This episode delves into the theme of our limited perspective. A new book gains popularity among the women of Seattle, but Frasier dismisses it due to its nostalgic romance and purple prose.
However, his opinion changes when he discovers that an old friend from Cheers wrote the book.
This book tells the story of Frasier’s first sexual relationship, as seen from the perspective of Clarice Warner, the woman who taught piano to a teenage Frasier.
She recalls how drawn she was to the sensitive young man and how his abrupt departure without saying goodbye shattered her.
Throughout the episode, Frasier grapples with guilt over how he treats Clarice, especially after Daphne confronts him about his cavalier attitude regarding the relationship.
It’s important to note that the story is narrated from Clarice’s point of view, but the author received this account from Frasier, shaping her perception of Clarice.
All of Clarice’s longing for Frasier in the book is a product of how Frasier imagined she felt after he left. Frasier clearly has a high opinion of himself.
The reality is that Clarice understood what was happening; she had a preference for younger men and viewed their relationship as a fling.
It was the young Frasier who believed he was a Casanova and a sensitive soul, thinking that losing him would be devastating.
This episode subtly examines Frasier’s character by highlighting how he perceives himself through a badly written book.
Frasier dislikes the book due to its verbosity, yet it astutely reflects his traits of verbosity and self-importance.
While these characteristics are distinctly Frasier’s, the inclination to assign personal meaning to life events or view them from a limited and individual perspective is something universally relatable.
Astha: “Slow Tango in South Seattle” is indeed an interesting episode.
It’s quite remarkable how an author was able to create an entire book based on a story Frasier shared one evening at Cheers.
While the story is about Frasier’s first sexual experience, it’s filled with hyperbole and excessive imagery, which is evident when Frasier skips pages while reading the book himself.
Additionally, the episode’s perspective is from Ms. Warner’s point of view, even though Frasier originally told the story to Fallow.
It’s a reflection of how highly Frasier thinks of himself.
I can understand why you found the episode eye-rolling, as it emphasizes the societal value placed on a person’s “virginity,” especially for women.
The fact that Frasier’s first sexual encounter was with his piano teacher, which you find unsettling, adds to the discomfort.
While there’s no way to know if Ms. Warner was his teacher all those years, the situation does raise concerns about exploitation.
In “The Unkindest Cut of All,” we see the first Eddie-centric episode, and Eddie the Jack Russell (Moose in real life) is a beloved character on the show.
The appearance of six adorable Jack Russell puppies, the result of Eddie’s escapades in the park, adds a delightful element to the episode.
However, Frasier’s well-intentioned but overbearing decision to have Eddie neutered causes a rift with Martin.
It’s clear that Eddie is Martin’s dog, and his actions crossed a line. If someone took similar liberties with your dog, you’d react the same way.
Sidant: “Slow Tango In South Seattle” glosses over many of the uncomfortable aspects of Frasier’s first sexual experience, especially those that can’t easily be played for comedy.
The humor in the episode stems from the embarrassment Frasier feels about the entire city of Seattle, including his father and brother, learning how he overly romanticized his first sexual relationship.
However, the fact that Ms. Warner may have committed statutory rape by engaging in a relationship with him and potentially others is not a comedic aspect.
There’s an evident double standard at play here. Martin seemed almost proud of Frasier for losing his virginity at a young age, but one can only imagine his reaction if the genders were reversed and Frasier’s daughter was taking lessons from Mr. Charlie Warner.
The show, for all its wit and humor, occasionally ventures into uncomfortable territory with its implications.
“The Unkindest Cut” offers a prime example of how to navigate the Niles/Daphne relationship without veering into problematic territory.
While Niles’ behavior in the first season was exaggerated for comedic purposes, his reaction to Daphne talking about her boyfriend in this episode ties into concerns related to abusive relationships.
In contrast, Niles putting pâté behind his ears to attract Eddie and, by extension, convince Daphne that he’s a suitable partner is entertaining because it’s an outrageous and essentially good-natured act.
In the neutering conflict between Frasier and Martin, I found myself siding with Frasier. Many states and cities have laws requiring pet neutering, and Eddie’s lack of neutering affects both Frasier and Martin.
Notably, no one brought up the fact that their neighbor’s dog was also intact.
Martin’s stubbornness hinders him from taking the necessary action, and when he lies to Frasier about it, he shouldn’t be surprised if Frasier takes matters into his own hands.
While the right to have Eddie neutered may be up for debate, Martin can’t expect a healthy relationship with his son if he’s going to lie about matters that Frasier deems essential.
They should either follow through with their plans or have an open discussion to find a mutually agreeable solution.
Astha: I also considered the double standard when it comes to the Frasier/Ms. Warner’s situation, and it’s troubling how we might romanticize it one way but consider it predatory if gender roles were reversed.
Personally, I find it predatory either way, and it’s quite unsettling.
Absolutely, dogs have a keen sense of people. Niles’ behavior in that scene came across as rather absurd, much like your take on it.
While he may not be particularly skilled with animals, he’s willing to go to great lengths, including allowing a sweet little puppy to lick liver from his ear, to demonstrate what a good person he is to impress Daphne.
I do think Niles is a good person, which made the addition of liver in that scene seem a bit odd to me.
It was clearly done for comedic effect, and the puppy would certainly pick up on his good intentions.
Eddie not being neutered doesn’t strike me as unusual, either. Enforcing spaying or neutering regulations can be challenging.
I adopted my dog from a shelter, where he was already neutered, due to state requirements.
However, I’m aware from visiting Los Angeles dog parks (where pets are often required to be spayed or neutered) that enforcing these rules can be difficult.
Martin could have continued to keep Eddie intact for as long as he wished until Frasier intervened.
The same goes for the neighbor Dorothea unless she had the necessary breeding documentation.
I would still be upset if someone took my dog for any procedure without my knowledge, regardless of the reason.
I don’t like that Martin didn’t have Eddie neutered, but I also don’t like that Frasier took it upon himself to make that decision for Eddie.
Sidant: The point I wanted to emphasize regarding Frasier and Martin is the importance of communication in their shared living situation.
For a healthy and positive environment, they must communicate openly.
If Martin lies to Frasier, he can’t expect such an environment, and the same goes for Frasier if he acts behind Martin’s back.
In the final speech, Frasier addresses Martin’s concerns about losing authority and the distinction between the lack of authority and the lack of respect.
This speech is especially effective after the power struggle depicted in the episode.
Given Martin’s relatively conservative nature, he may still view his relationship with Frasier through the traditional parent/child dynamic, where he, as the father, sets the rules.
However, Frasier is an adult with his ideas about running a household, and Martin needs to respect that.
Simultaneously, Frasier shouldn’t treat Martin as a houseguest who must conform to his way of doing things.
They are roommates, and the only way to strengthen their relationship is by working together.
You Might Like To Read: Team-Up Review: Frasier, “Daphne’s Room” And “The Club”